House Republicans fume over border security issues

1
A sign marks an area restricted by the U.S. Border Patrol near the line between Juarez and El Paso. (Mariana Dell/Borderzine.com)

A sign marks an area restricted by the U.S. Border Patrol near the line between Juarez and El Paso. (Mariana Dell/Borderzine.com)

WASHINGTON – On the same day the Senate passed an immigration reform bill, a small group of House Republicans voiced concerns over border security problems.

Republican members of the House Subcommittee on National Security on Oversight and Government Reform brought up numerous concerns for border patrol executives about a new report and border security in general at a hearing Thursday.

The Government Accountability Office testified about a report, also released Thursday, that said a $1 billion tax-funded border security program had failed.

The Secure Border Initiative Network used technology to create a so-called “virtual fence.” Deemed a failure four years after it began, the program was shut down in 2011.

“I know you can never satisfy any government agency’s appetite for money or land, but I’m really skeptical as to whether we can officially and effectively spend all the money we’re throwing at this effort,” Rep. John J. Duncan, R-Tenn., said.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz. R-Utah, says he is concerned that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection does nothing to track of immigrants when they leave the United States. SHFWire photo by Caleigh Bourgeois

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, the subcommittee chair, said his main concern is that border agents do not track immigrants and international visitors when they leave the United States. Therefore, it is almost impossible to keep track of immigrants who overstay visitor visas.

“It’s probably the biggest gaping hole we have in our border,” he said.

David Murphy, acting assistant commissioner in the Office of Field Operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said there is no system for tracking exits right now, but the Department of Homeland Security is trying to create one.

Other concerns included logistics.

DHS currently measures success rate by the number of people it catches crossing the border without authorization. Apprehensions have recently gone up, after a period of decline.

However, Rebecca Gambler, from the Government Accountability Office, said the current evaluation system is ineffective at actually measuring success. She said border security should instead set up a series of goals and measure success by comparing progress to those goals.

“The Department of Homeland Security has not taken steps to assess or quantify the contributions that fencing is making to border security, and we recommended that they conduct a cost-effective analysis to do that,” she said.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said he also wants a goal, but asked Gambler to specify what that goal might be.

“If you were empress for the day, what would you do? ” he said.

Gambler said she was not sure what the goal should be, but the GAO should have a better idea when a new report is finished in July.

Gowdy was not satisfied.

“If you don’t … prove to your constituents that you have a reasonable but ambitious security goal, that makes it pretty tough,” he said.

Chaffetz said he is upset that border security is not properly keeping track of its success level, especially when it comes to people leaving the country.

“I think it’s the untold story of the immigration problem and mess that we have,” he said.

The House leadership has said the Senate bill is unlikely to get a vote on the floor. The Senate bill calls for doubling the number or border agents.

Committee members reflected many Republicans’ concerns over border security, which may or may not affect votes if a bill gets to the House floor.

“If you don’t know where you’re going, you won’t know when you get there,” Gowdy said.

__________

Editor’s note: This article was previously published by The Scripps Howard Foundation Wire.

Comments

comments

Share.

1 Comment

  1. Roberto Perezdiaz
    Roberto Perezdiaz on

    Duh! A Mexican $1200/year work permit program that allows travel to anyplace in the US renewable at the US Mexico Border would be a solution too simple for politicians to grasp. Our government has already demonstrated to the world it invades our privacy and even that of our allies at will, thanks to the brave efforts of Edward Snowden, it should be simple enough to barcode work permits. They are “undocumented” but working and most have cell phones. They could call in periodically. Even giving out and paying for cell phone service would be cheaper than what is spent on border security. It would make a lot of families separated by our present dehumanizing immigration policies very happy permitting their reunification. The alternative, more spying on citizens and hiring more federal police to protect us is a formula too frightening for so-called freedom loving citizens to tolerate. Federal law enforcement jobs are coveted and those officers will obey orders blindly against us in the name of the law. How we treat the weakest among us will be the way we will all be treated.

Leave A Reply

Don't miss a thing! Signup here for unique coverage of border life you won't find anywhere else

Join our mailing list to receive weekly news and commentary on Border Life

I am a..

Thank you! You have successfully subscribed.